Pourquoi le fait que les femmes apprennent à guider bénéficie à tout le monde

Traduit de l’anglais, original ici

Au printemps 2026, deux femmes ont décidé de danser une tanda dans une milonga notoirement traditionnelle de Buenos Aires. Elles ont ensuite été réprimandées et agressées physiquement par l’organisateur de la milonga, également connu pour ses méthodes intolérantes de gestion du public, distribuant des cartons « rouges » et « jaunes » et insistant sur des rôles traditionnellement genrés dans ses événements. Diverses associations de professionnel·le·s du tango en Argentine et ailleurs ont depuis condamné son comportement comme une discrimination de genre. Pour beaucoup de gens, cet incident a sonné comme un retour absurde dans le passé, car la plupart d’entre nous sont désormais habitués à ce que les rôles ne soient plus strictement genrés. Cette roue de l’histoire a peu de chances d’être retournée en arrière, et j’écris cet article, le premier depuis la pandémie (oui !), pour vous expliquer pourquoi je pense que le fait que de plus en plus de femmes guident est une très bonne chose pour la communauté du tango dans son ensemble.

Si vous êtes un·e danseur·euse social·e avec quelques années d’expérience, et surtout si vous vous êtes aventuré·e dans l’organisation d’événements, l’enseignement ou la gestion d’une école de tango, vous avez pris conscience, à un moment ou à un autre, que l’économie de notre beau monde du tango repose essentiellement sur la disponibilité et le comportement des leaders masculins. Le tango est un monde d’hommes parce que dans la plupart des communautés, à quelques heureuses exceptions près, il y a bien plus de femmes que d’hommes. Du coup, pour qu’une activité de tango soit couronnée de succès, il faut un nombre suffisant de leaders masculins prêts à y participer, sans quoi toute l’entreprise s’effondre. Cela crée une dynamique dans laquelle les followers féminines dépendent des leaders masculins désireux de prendre des cours, de sortir danser, de pratiquer et de participer à des événements spéciaux, bien plus que l’inverse.

C’est un phénomène bien observé, notamment dans les grandes villes comme Paris, où je vis. Avoir trop de followers féminines pour chaque leader masculin pousse les followers à travailler dur sur leurs compétences, leur apparence et leur attractivité globale. Tout cela réduit en même temps les enjeux pour les leaders masculins d’obtenir les danseuses qu’ils souhaitent, les rendant moins enclins à se concurrencer mutuellement et à améliorer leurs compétences. Si un grand nombre de followers féminines sont prêtes à danser avec vous en milonga parce qu’elles ne veulent pas passer des heures assises à attendre, la tentation est forte, en tant que leader, de l’attribuer à votre propre mérite.

Quand il y a trop peu d’hommes et trop de femmes, avec des followers qui s’améliorent grâce à une concurrence acharnée et des leaders qui ne progressent pas faute de cette même concurrence, on peut observer l’effet en cascade de ce déséquilibre sur littéralement tous les domaines du tango. Les milongas locales se retrouvent avec bien plus de followers qui ne dansent pas, qui s’en frustrent et abandonnent. Les leaders masculins disponibles, malgré leurs privilèges évidents, ressentent plus de pression pour danser avec des followers qu’ils ne choisiraient pas nécessairement. Les professeur·e·s locaux·ales peinent à remplir leurs cours parce que les leaders masculins arrêtent d’apprendre après à peine un ou deux ans de tango, une fois qu’ils ont accès aux followers qu’ils apprécient. Un nombre insuffisant de leaders masculins dans les cours signifie que de nombreuses followers ne peuvent pas étudier ni pratiquer. Il y a moins de gens qui prennent des cours, moins de gens qui pratiquent et progressent, et le niveau de compétence de la communauté dans son ensemble stagne, faisant de chaque événement local un spectacle du « toujours pareil ».

Certaines followers frustrées quittent le tango ou cessent de progresser, parce qu’à quoi bon. D’autres deviennent agressives dans leur poursuite des leaders disponibles, portant la « concurrence acharnée » à un autre niveau. D’autres encore se laissent entraîner dans une spirale toxique consistant à essayer de surpasser toutes les autres femmes en termes de compétence, d’âge et de beauté. Les leaders masculins suffisamment motivés et talentueux pour devenir de bons danseurs sont chéris comme les quelques « stars » de la communauté avec qui toutes les followers souhaitent danser. Cela crée un déséquilibre des pouvoirs et une aura de célébrité que peu d’égos masculins peuvent résister à abuser. Ces hommes s’en sortent alors avec des comportements discutables, protégés par leur statut de « bon danseur » ou de « brillant professionnel ».

Les mêmes dynamiques sont présentes dans les événements spéciaux. Dans une situation de déséquilibre de genre sévère, les organisateur·trice·s de festivals peinent à remplir les stages, et choisissent souvent d’inviter les mêmes couples d’enseignant·e·s qui sont les stars du moment, dans l’espoir que leur renommée attire des étudiants masculins. Cependant, les couples célèbres sont coûteux, et il devient d’autant plus crucial d’attirer suffisamment de leaders masculins pour remplir les stages en les associant à une large population de followers féminines avides et désespérées. Dans de nombreux événements, les organisateur·trice·s font peser sur les followers féminines la pression d’équilibrer les genres, en leur demandant de s’inscrire en couple avec un homme (et non avec « un·e leader »). Les followers solos se retrouvent, encore et encore, en queue d’une longue liste d’attente. Certains événements tentent d’équilibrer les genres eux-mêmes, créant un autre phénomène intéressant : des leaders masculins que les organisateur·trice·s poursuivent pour remplir le quota avec une réduction significative, voire gratuitement. Ces hommes ne s’inscrivent plus ni ne paient l’événement aussi tôt que tout le monde, alors que la liste d’attente des followers solos continue de s’allonger, puis débarquent à la dernière minute minute, tel un chevalier en armure étincelante, pour sauver quelque chanceuse demoiselle en détresse.

Le déséquilibre de genre en faveur des hommes engendre beaucoup de frustration, de doute de soi, d’autodénigrement et d’abandon de soi chez les femmes prises dans cette dynamique. Je tiens à souligner que le déséquilibre lui-même n’est pas la faute des leaders masculins (après tout, ce sont eux qui dansent déjà). Le problème, c’est la façon dont le déséquilibre affecte le capital social et les récompenses sociales de chacun·e. On observerait probablement des phénomènes similaires si le déséquilibre de genre était inversé. J’ai parlé à des femmes qui ne supportaient plus d’attendre un leader disponible dans une rangée d’autres femmes, toutes bien habillées, la plupart tout à fait ou même exceptionnellement compétentes, toutes passionnément amoureuses du tango. C’est pire quand on est une femme plus âgée. Je me souviens d’un post sur les réseaux sociaux d’une professeure parisienne, exprimant sa tristesse face au peu d’intérêt des leaders masculins pour les cours par rapport aux femmes qui continuaient à améliorer leur danse, et de la quantité stupéfiante de vitriol dans les commentaires de ce post, provenant majoritairement d’hommes.

Dans le domaine professionnel, le déséquilibre de genre prend un lourd tribut invisible sur les danseuses. Alors qu’un bon danseur masculin est une star, même avec peu de références et un niveau de danse médiocre, une excellente follower professionnelle est simplement dans l’ordre des choses et ne vaut pas cher. De nombreuses professeures locales gèrent des écoles, des événements et des stages, accomplissant tout le travail fastidieux qui consiste à faire exister une communauté, pour qu’un professeur masculin invité (souvent d’Argentine) arrive, fasse son truc, soit payé et disparaisse vers un autre engagement où une autre femme fait tout, mais est considérée pour toujours comme son « assistante ». En tant qu’artiste en collaboration avec un partenaire, les femmes savent qu’en cas de rupture du couple, l’homme aura une multitude d’excellentes followers parmi lesquelles choisir, tandis qu’une follower professionnelle aura très probablement du mal à trouver un nouveau partenaire à son niveau. Il est plus fréquent qu’après une rupture, la star masculine du duo continue sa brillante carrière sans interruption, parfois avec une follower bien plus jeune et moins expérimentée, tandis que la carrière de la star féminine stagne ou qu’elle doit repartir de zéro. Parfois, plus vous êtes expérimentée en tant que follower professionnelle, moins les professionnels masculins voudront collaborer avec vous parce que vous avez traversé beaucoup de choses, que vous savez comment faire tourner la baraque et que vous êtes moins disposée à vous abandonner à sa prétendue supériorité.

Les femmes dans les couples professionnels prennent souvent en charge la majeure partie du travail répétitif, ennuyeux mais nécessaire qui entre dans le maintien d’une collaboration et d’un « produit » artistique, un travail qui passe inaperçu et n’est pas récompensé. Combien de couples d’enseignant·e·s avez-vous rencontrés dans lesquels l’homme fait la plupart des interventions dans sa propre langue et la femme traduit ce qu’il dit dans une langue étrangère pour que les élèves puissent comprendre ? Devoir traduire signifie que vous avez bien moins de temps pour dire quelque chose vous-même. Cela signifie aussi que vous êtes au service de votre partenaire plutôt que d’être son égale. Combien de couples d’enseignant·e·s avez-vous vus dans lesquels c’est la femme qui gère toute la correspondance, les présences des élèves, la communication, les paiements et la planification, tandis que l’homme ne fait qu’entrer pour briller et divertir en tant que professeur ? Ajoutez à cela qu’il est assez facile pour un danseur masculin solo de travailler comme professeur·e itinérant·e et artiste, alors que c’est parfois impossible pour une professionnelle.

À toutes mes consœurs de métier, professeures, artistes et organisatrices, je veux dire : je vous vois. Je connais votre douleur. J’y suis passée.

« Oh non, encore une féministe qui s’en prend aux hommes », pensez-vous peut-être. Alors, qu’en est-il des hommes ?

Danser en tant que leader masculin dans une communauté fortement déséquilibrée s’accompagne évidemment de nombreux privilèges. Mais, comme dans tout déséquilibre de pouvoir, il y a des coûts cachés pour ceux qui se trouvent au sommet de la hiérarchie. Le premier, évident, c’est que quand vous n’avez plus envie de développer vos compétences en tango, vous passez à côté de votre propre potentiel. Bien sûr, améliorer sa danse n’est pas un impératif. On peut en profiter sans chercher à s’améliorer. Mais développer ses compétences est en réalité une grande partie du plaisir et de la beauté de toute l’aventure, et vous y renoncez délibérément simplement parce qu’il y a peu ou pas de concurrence ?

Une autre conséquence insidieuse du déséquilibre, c’est qu’en tant que leader masculin, vous danserez avec des followers que vous appréciez mais qui ne dansent avec vous que parce que c’est vous ou ne pas danser du tout. Elles ne vous le diront pas. Elles seront aimables. Elles feront en sorte que vous ne le remarquiez pas. Si vous êtes à l’aise avec un consentement à moitié sincère, alors c’est très bien. Mais ne préféreriez-vous pas que votre partenaire de danse désire vraiment cette tanda avec vous ? Et enfin, comme je l’ai mentionné, il y a une pression constante sur les leaders masculins disponibles, en particulier les plus compétents, pour qu’ils dansent avec autant de followers que possible. Cela prive souvent de la possibilité de choisir uniquement celles que l’on veut, et être sélectif vous fait passer pour un snob arrogant. Et on vous lance des regards noirs si vous osez suivre ou guider un autre homme. Pourtant, on sait tous qu’apprendre à suivre rend tout leader meilleur dans son guidage. Et si vous aimiez vraiment suivre en tant qu’homme ? Dieu nous en préserve !

Ainsi, dans de nombreuses communautés, notamment en Europe, dans les deux premières décennies de ce siècle, le tango était cette belle chose qui nous faisait aussi beaucoup souffrir, en particulier les femmes. Et puis la pandémie est arrivée.

Pendant les confinements liés au Covid, plusieurs choses se sont produites. Alors qu’il n’y avait plus de tango, beaucoup de gens se sont tournés vers les cours en ligne, souvent en solo, femmes et hommes. Parfois, c’était simplement une tentative désespérée de s’accrocher à la bouée de sauvetage du tango alors que le monde était en plein arrêt. Pour certaines personnes, c’était la première fois qu’elles prenaient un cours de technique. Beaucoup de gens ont réalisé qu’améliorer leurs compétences était en réalité incroyablement fun et gratifiant. Une fois que les milongas ont été de nouveau possibles, ces élèves en ligne sont revenu·e·s au tango avec une soif renouvelée d’amélioration. Mais ce qui a vraiment été un moment charnière, c’est la façon dont les femmes ont commencé à pratiquer entre elles, faute de partenaires masculins, et donc à apprendre à guider : une compétence qu’elles avaient longtemps voulu essayer, mais que la rude concurrence pour être une follower désirable avait accaparé tout leur temps et leur énergie.

Ici à Paris, alors que les milongas en intérieur étaient encore interdites, les gens allaient danser en plein air pendant les mois d’été, et j’étais stupéfaite de voir combien de femmes dansaient et pratiquaient ensemble. J’en faisais partie. Le changement semblait significatif. Dès que j’ai pu rouvrir mes cours en présentiel, j’ai commencé à donner des ateliers de « guidage pour femmes » et jusqu’à aujourd’hui, ces ateliers sont un succès stable. Je connais quelques autres professionnelles dans différentes parties du monde qui ont ressenti ce changement et ont commencé à proposer des cours de guidage pour les femmes aussi. À Paris, nous avons désormais un collectif, Las Malevas, composé de quatre professeures femmes (moi y compris) qui propose des cours hebdomadaires de guidage pour femmes. Tout ça n’est pas pour dire que les femmes se sont mises à guider en milonga ou à prendre des cours en tant que leader uniquement après la pandémie. Beaucoup le faisaient déjà bien avant. Des événements célébrant les femmes et des practicas exclusivement féminines existaient déjà dans certains endroits avant la pandémie. Mais dans de nombreuses communautés, c’est après la pandémie que ces chiffres ont explosé.

Une autre chose qui s’est produite, c’est ce que j’appellerais « un bond de conscience ». Quand le tango nous a été temporairement arraché de force, beaucoup de danseur·euse·s, et en particulier des femmes, ont réfléchi et se sont parlé de ce qu’ils et elles aimaient et détestaient dans le tango. Et beaucoup d’entre elles ont commencé à rejeter l’idée de devoir chercher un partenaire masculin pour avoir le droit de participer à un marathon ou à un festival. Si un événement n’admettait pas les femmes leaders, les danseur·euse·s double rôle ou les followers féminines solos, elles n’en voulaient plus. Elles en avaient marre du principe du « trouve-toi d’abord un homme avant de pouvoir profiter du tango ». À la place, elles cherchaient d’autres femmes avec qui s’associer.

Ce changement a eu un impact rapide et visible sur l’économie du tango. Les professeur·e·s ont commencé à vendre plus de cours. Les écoles locales sont devenues plus enclines à enseigner les deux rôles à tout le monde dès le départ, ce qui a rendu le déséquilibre de genre moins problématique, y compris dans les cours avec trop d’élèves masculins. Maintenant que c’est normal de changer de rôle, les hommes apprennent et pratiquent ensemble sans problème. Et même si c’était peut-être déjà le cas dans de nombreuses écoles avant la pandémie, c’est aujourd’hui en train de devenir une pratique courante.

Toutes les grandes marques de chaussures de tango ont commencé à concevoir et à vendre rapidement ce qu’on appelle les « chaussures de pratique » pour les femmes, de jolies bottines en cuir à talon bas que l’on peut désormais trouver dans toutes les couleurs et matières possibles. Notez qu’on les appelle encore « chaussures de pratique », bien que beaucoup de femmes les portent en milonga, aussi bien pour guider que pour suivre, renonçant parfois complètement aux talons hauts. Pourtant, d’une certaine façon, le guidage pour les femmes, c’est encore de la « pratique », pas quelque chose de sérieux, n’est-ce pas ? Oh, le doux parfum douceâtre de la misogynie discrète qui subsiste ici et là. Pratiquement chaque femme que je connais possède désormais une paire de ces jolies petites bottines. Elles sont idéales pour guider mais aussi pour suivre, car contrairement aux lourdes baskets de danse, elles paraissent élégantes avec des jupes et des robes. Et avez-vous remarqué que les femmes en pantalon font leur retour en force ?

Quand des followers commencent à guider, elles ont déjà deux atouts pour elles. Premièrement, elles ont l’habitude de travailler dur et d’améliorer leurs compétences, et elles savent que ça paye. Elles sont enclines à travailler dur dans les cours et à consacrer du temps à pratiquer et à danser en tant que leader en milonga. Deuxièmement, elles ont toutes vécu l’expérience d’une mauvaise tanda avec un leader aux compétences médiocres, elles sont passées pas ces experiences à de nombreuses reprises. Cela les rend déterminées à être des leaders attentionnées et confortables. Elles doivent également combattre un certain nombre de stéréotypes, comme « les femmes sont terribles en navigation » ou « ce n’est jamais aussi bien qu’avec un homme ». Plus les femmes deviennent de bonnes leaders, plus d’autres femmes veulent danser avec elles, ce qui signifie que certaines followers n’ont plus à se fier à ces tandas de « consentement à moitié sincère » avec des leaders masculins pour lesquels elles n’avaient pas grand enthousiasme auparavant. Beaucoup de followers me disent qu’elles préféreraient de loin danser avec une leader féminine moins expérimentée mais attentive et investie plutôt qu’avec certains leaders masculins avec qui elles dansaient avant.

Le seul groupe moins enthousiaste face à tout ce développement est bien sûr celui de ces leaders masculins, qui font maintenant face à une concurrence qu’ils n’avaient pas vue venir.

Avec des baby leaders avides d’apprendre, les organisateur·trice·s d’événements peuvent remplir davantage de stages lors des festivals. Les événements de danse sociale s’ouvrent désormais lentement à la possibilité de déconnecter le genre des rôles, même si cela reste délicat, les marathons cherchant toujours un équilibre de genre pour une bonne raison. On peut désormais préciser non seulement son genre, mais aussi si l’on danse « principalement en tant que follower » ou « principalement en tant que leader » ou « les deux à égalité » lors de l’inscription à la plupart des marathons. Et bien que les festivals de tango queer et les événements double rôle existent dans le monde depuis plus de deux décennies, ces événements reçoivent également un afflux de nouveaux·elles danseur·euse·s, des femmes (et quelques hommes) qui aiment danser les deux rôles mais ne s’identifient pas nécessairement comme queer. Et c’est ainsi que les femmes qui se libèrent de la pression écrasante d’une concurrence injuste, libèrent tout le monde. Les hommes peuvent désormais danser et pratiquer ensemble s’ils le souhaitent, et cela change clairement leur expérience du tango pour le mieux.

Enfin, les couples professionnels féminins obtiennent une plus grande reconnaissance. Je le sais bien car j’en fais partie, je travaille avec une formidable leader féminine, Asya Moiseeva. Vous pouvez probablement nommer un·e ou deux leaders féminines ou duos, bien que globalement il y ait encore plus de couples de tango masculins et qu’ils aient tendance à être plus connus. Malgré le nouvel équilibre trouvé, le tango reste très centré sur la présence masculine, la compétence masculine, la virtuosité masculine. Bien que les organisateur·trice·s soient désormais plus disposé·e·s à inviter des couples féminins, il est souvent encore difficile d’attirer des leaders masculins à un stage animé par une leader féminine. En revanche, quand les organisateur·trice·s ajoutent un couple féminin à leur programme, ils et elles peuvent être sûr·e·s d’attirer des danseur·euse·s double rôle qui voudront apprendre d’elles. Cela me rend optimiste pour l’avenir des collaborations exclusivement féminines et pour que les artistes féminines soient prises plus au sérieux. Aux organisateur·trice·s, je voudrais dire : quelle que soit l’admiration que vous portez à vos artistes masculins préférés, vous pouvez être certain·e·s que leurs partenaires féminines et les professionnelles féminines en général ont très probablement dû travailler bien plus dur et surmonter bien plus d’obstacles pour arriver là où elles en sont.

Un résultat moins attendu du fait que les femmes se tournent vers le guidage, c’est que beaucoup d’entre elles, et en particulier les femmes plus mûres, découvrent qu’elles sont des leaders nées. Elles aiment en réalité guider bien plus que suivre. Cela signifie que de nombreuses femmes plus âgées trouvent soudainement une voix authentique et une place dans le tango où elles sont recherchées pour leurs compétences par d’autres femmes, tout en étant ignorées par les leaders masculins. Le guidage leur offre une sorte de « deuxième vie » en tant que femme dans le tango. Et découvrir comment le guidage s’aligne naturellement avec leur personnalité est en soi quelque chose de magique. Nous voyons traditionnellement le guidage comme un rôle « masculin », mais les qualités d’un bon leader (être capable d’écouter, de guider, de divertir, d’engager, de protéger, d’assumer ses responsabilités, de communiquer, de se connecter) sont en réalité aussi celles d’un bon parent. D’une bonne mère. Beaucoup de femmes sont des leaders nées simplement parce qu’elles sont des femmes. Qui l’eût cru !

Est-ce que ça veut dire qu’en tant que follower féminine, vous devez maintenant absolument apprendre à guider ? Pas si vous n’en avez pas envie. Vous êtes tout à fait libre de vous en tenir à suivre. Ce qui est bien avec le guidage, c’est que peu importe quand vous commencez, du moment que vous l’appréciez. Vos compétences de follower seront d’une grande aide et accéléreront considérablement le processus d’apprentissage lorsque vous choisirez de commencer à guider. La bonne nouvelle, c’est aussi qu’en tant que follower, vous verrez désormais de plus en plus de bonnes leaders féminines en milonga qui pourraient vouloir vous faire la mirada. Restez à l’affût des cabeceos inattendus. Vous ne saurez souvent pas qu’une femme est également une excellente leader si elle danse les deux rôles, il n’y a pas beaucoup de façons de signaler aux autres femmes « je guide aussi », même si vous portez un pantalon et des bottines de « pratique ». Si en tant que femme vous guidez déjà, n’ayez pas peur de vous montrer. Vous n’avez pas à être parfaite. Vous n’avez même pas à être très bonne pour recevoir beaucoup de tentatives de cabeceo de la part de certaines des meilleures followers de la ville !

À toutes les personnes qui, comme l’organisateur de l’infâme milonga de Buenos Aires, pensent que le vrai tango ne peut se produire qu’entre un homme (hétérosexuel) et une femme (hétérosexuelle), je me sens envie de dire que vous avez le droit de le ressentir ainsi, du moment que vous n’usez pas de violence sur les personnes qui ont une opinion différente. La beauté du tango est qu’il vous pousse à trouver votre propre « vrai tango », celui qui fonctionne pour vous, à condition que personne d’autre ne soit blessé·e dans le processus. Cette danse a longtemps été définie par des corps masculins dansant avec des corps féminins et nous sommes habitués à ce que cela se ressente ainsi, de sorte que deux corps féminins ou deux corps masculins dansant ensemble sont forcément différents à ressentir et à voir. Mais différent est-il moins vrai ? Peut-être pour vous. Pas pour moi, pas avec mon expérience. Je crois que ce n’est pas notre genre, ni notre orientation sexuelle, ni notre âge, ni notre morphologie qui font de nous un·e danseur·euse de tango, c’est la façon dont nous nous connectons à notre corps, à la musique, au sol, à l’autre personne. C’est notre capacité à nous abandonner à cette danse et à rendre quelqu’un merveilleusement heureux·se d’être dans nos bras le temps de quelques chansons. Cette magie tranquille, profonde et transformatrice d’une vraiment belle tanda. Vous voyez ? J’en suis sûre.

Mai 13, 2026

Why women learning to lead is good for everyone

Some time in spring of 2026, two women decided to dance a tanda at a notoriously traditional milonga in Buenos Aires. They were then scolded and physically attacked by the milonga’s organiser, equally notorious for his intolerant ways of managing the public by giving out “red” and “yellow” cards and insisting on traditionally gendered roles in his events. Various associations of tango professionals in Argentina and beyond have since condemned his behavior as gender discrimination. For many dancers, this whole incident sounded like an absurd blast from the past, as most of us are now used to roles no longer being strictly gendered. This particular wheel of history is unlikely to be turned around and I’m writing this article, my first since the pandemic (yes!), to tell you why I think that more and more women leading is a very good thing for tango community as a whole.

If you are a social dancer with a few years of experience, and especially if you’ve dabbed into event organising, teaching or running a tango school, you have become, at some point, painfully aware that the economics of our beautiful tango world hinge primarily on the availability and the behaviour of the male leaders. Tango is a men’s world because in most communities, with a few lucky exceptions, there are way more women than men. Therefore for any tango activity to be successful, you need a high enough number of male leaders willing to participate or the whole enterprise crumbles to the ground. This creates a dynamic in which female followers are dependent on male leaders willing to take classes, go out dancing, practice and participate in special events way more than the other way around.

This is a well-observed phenomenon, especially in large cities like Paris, where I live. Having too many female followers for each male leader makes followers work hard on their skills, looks and overall attractiveness. All the while reducing the stakes for the male leaders to get the dancers they want, making them less eager to compete with each other and to improve their skills. If a lof of female followers are willing to dance with you in a milonga because they don’t want to spend hours sitting and waiting, as a leader the temptation is strong to see it as your own merit.

When there are too few men and too many women, with followers getting better due to cut throat competition and leaders not improving because of the lack thereof, we can observe the ripple effect of that imbalance on literally every domain of tango. Local milongas are faced with way more followers not dancing, getting frustrated and quitting. The available male leaders, despite the obvious privileges, feel more pressure to dance with followers they wouldn’t necessarily choose. Local teachers struggle to fill up their classes because male leaders quit learning after barely one-two years of tango, once they have gained access to followers they like. Not enough male leaders in classes means many followers are not able to study or practice. There are less people taking classes, less people practicing and improving and the community level of skill as a whole stagnates, making every local event a bit of a “same old, same old”.

Some frustrated followers leave tango altogether or quit improving as well, because what’s the point. Others become aggressive in going after the available leaders, taking the “cut throat competition” to another level. Yet others are pulled into a toxic spiral of trying to outperform all other women when it comes to skill, age and beauty. Male leaders motivated and talented enough to become good dancers are cherished as the few “stars” of the community that all the followers want to dance with. This creates a power imbalance and a celebrity aura that not many male egos can resist abusing. These men then get away with questionable behaviour, protected by their status of a “good dancer” or a “brilliant professional”.

The same dynamics are present in special events. In a situation of severe gender imbalance festival organisers struggle to fill up the workshops, so they will often choose to invite the same teaching couples that are the stars of the moment, in hopes that their fame attracts male students. However, celebrity couples are expensive, so it becomes even more crucial to get enough male leaders to fill up the workshops by pairing them with a large population of eager and desperate female followers. In many events, the organisers put the pressure of balancing the genders on the female followers, by requiring them to register in couple with a man (and not “a leader”). Single followers find themselves, again and again, at the tail end of a long waiting list. Some events try to balance the genders themselves, creating another interesting phenomenon: male leaders that are chased by the organisers to fill up the quota with a significant discount or even for free. These men no longer register or pay for the event as early as everyone else, while the waiting list of solo followers keeps growing, and then swoop in like a knight in shining armor to save some lucky damsel in distress.

Gender imbalance in favour of men creates a lot of frustration, self-doubt, self-loathing and self-abandonment in women who are trapped in that dynamic. I want to stress that the imbalance itself is not the fault of the male leaders (after all, they are the ones who already dance). The problem is how the imbalance affects the social capital and the social rewards of everyone involved. We would probably observe similar phenomena were the gender balance reversed. I’ve talked to women who could no longer stand having to wait for an available leader in a row of other women, all of them well-dressed, most of them quite or even exceptionally skilled, all of them passionately in love with tango. It’s worse when you are an older woman. I remember a social media post by a female teacher from Paris, expressing her sadness at how little male leaders were interested in taking classes as opposed to women who kept improving their dance, and the astonishing amount of vitriol in the comments on that post, mostly from men.

In the professional field, gender imbalance takes a severe invisible toll on female dancers. While a good male dancer is a star, even with few credentials and a subpar level of dancing, an excellent professional follower is just business as usual and a dime a dozen. Many local female teachers run schools, events and workshops, doing all the tedious work of keeping a community together, for an invited male teacher (often from Argentina) to come in, do his thing, get paid and disappear to another gig where another women is doing everything, yet is forever considered his “assistant”. As an artist in a collaboration with a partner, women know that in case of the couple breaking up the man will have a multitude of excellent followers to choose from, whereas a female professional follower will most likely struggle to find a new partner at her level. It is more frequent that after a breakup the male star of the duo continues his brilliant career uninterrupted, sometimes with a much younger and less experienced follower, while the female star’s career stagnates or she has to start from scratch. Sometimes, the more experienced you are as a professional follower, the less male professionals will want to collaborate with you because you’ve been through a lot and you know how shit’s done and you are less willing to self-abandon to his perceived superiority.

Women in professional couples often take upon themselves most of the repetitive, boring but necessary labour that goes into maintaining a collaboration and an artistic “product”, labour that goes unnoticed and unrewarded. How many teaching couples have you met in which the man does most of the talking in his own language and the woman translates what he says to a foreign language so that the students can understand? Having to translate means you have way less time to actually say something yourself. It also means you are in service of your partner instead of being an equal. How many teaching couples have you seen in which it’s the woman who handles all the correspondence and the student attendance and the communication and the payments and the planning, while the man only comes in to shine and to entertain as a teacher? Add to this that it is quite easy for a solo male dancer to work as a traveling teacher and artist, while it is sometimes impossible for a female professional.

To all my sisters in trade, teachers, performers and organisers, I want to say: I see you. I know your pain. I’ve been there.

“Oh no, not another feminist bashing on men,” you might be thinking. So what about the men?

Dancing as a male leader in a strongly imbalanced community obviously comes with many privileges. However, as in every power imbalance, there are hidden costs for those on top of the hierarchy. The first obvious one is that when you are no longer interested in developing your tango skills, you are missing out on your own potential. Of course, improving your dance is not an imperative. You can enjoy it without striving for self-improvement. But developing your skills is actually a big part of the fun and the beauty of the whole endeavour and you willingly give up on that just because there is little to no competition?

Another insidious consequence of the imbalance is that, as a male leader, you will dance with followers you like but who only dance with you because it’s either you or not dancing at all. They won’t tell you that. They’ll be friendly. They’ll make sure you don’t notice. If you are ok with half-hearted consent, then it’s fine. But wouldn’t you prefer your dance partner to really desire this tanda with you? And lastly, as I mentioned, there is a constant pressure on the available male leaders, especially the skilled ones, to dance with as many followers as they can. This often takes away the option of choosing only the ones you want and being picky makes you feel like a arrogant snob. And you get dirty looks if you dare to follow or lead another man. Yet, we all know that learning to follow makes every leader better at leading. Also, what if you actually really like following as a man? God forbid!

And so in many communities, especially in Europe, in the first two decades of this century tango was this beautiful thing that also made so many of us struggle, especially women. And then the pandemic hit.

During covid lockdowns, a few things happened. While there was no more tango, many people turned to online classes, often solo, women and men alike. Sometimes it was simply a desperate attempt to hold on to the life line of tango while the world was in full shutdown. For some people it was the first time they took a technique class. Many people realised that improving their skills was actually incredibly fun and rewarding. Once milongas were possible again, these online students came back to tango with a renewed thirst for improvement. But what was truly momentous was the way women started practicing with other women, for the lack of male partners, and therefore learning how to lead: a skill they had long wanted to try but the tough competition to be a desirable follower had taken up all their time and effort.

Here in Paris, while the inside milongas were still prohibited, people went to dance in open air events during summer months and I was amazed to see how many women were dancing and practicing with each other. I was also one of them. The shift felt significant. The moment I could reopen my classes in person, I started giving “leading for women” workshops and to this day, these workshops are a stable success. I know a few other female professionals in different parts of the world who felt that shift too and started offering leading for women classes. In Paris, we now have a collective, Las Malevas, of four female teachers (me included) that offers weekly leading for women classes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like women weren’t leading in milongas or taking classes as a leader before. Plenty of them did. Events celebrating women and all-female practicas existed in some places already before the pandemic. But in many communities it’s after the pandemic that those numbers exploded.

Another thing that happened was what I would call “a leap in awareness”. When tango was forcibly taken away from us, temporarily, many dancers, and especially women, reflected on and talked to each other about what they loved and hated about tango. And many of them started rejecting the idea of having to look for a male partner in order to be allowed to participate in a marathon or a festival. If an event did not allow for women leaders, double role dancers or solo female followers, they didn’t want it. They were done with that whole “get yourself a man first before you can enjoy tango” thing. Instead, they sought out other women to partner with.

The shift had a quick and visible impact on tango economy. Teachers started selling more classes. Local schools became more inclined to teach everyone both roles from the start, which made the gender imbalance less of an issue, including in classes with too many male students. Now that it’s normal to switch roles, men learn and practice with each other without a second thought. And although this might have been the case in many schools before the pandemic, nowadays it is becoming a mainstream practice.

All the big tango shoe brands started expeditiously designing and selling the so-called “practice shoes” for women, cute leather boots with a low heel that you can now get in all possible colours and materials. Note how they are still called “practice shoes” although a lot of women wear them in milongas, both for leading and following, sometimes forsaking the high heels altogether. Yet somehow leading for women is still “practice”, not a real thing, right? Oh the sweetly rotten scent of inconspicuous misogyny still lingering here and there. Practically every woman I know now owns a pair of cute little boots. They are great for leading but also for following because, unlike the bulky dance sneakers, they look elegant with skirts and dresses. And did you notice that women dancing in pants is trending again?

When followers start to lead, they have two things already going for them. One, they are used to working hard and to improving their skills, and they know that there’s a payoff. They are inclined to work hard in classes and to dedicate time to practicing and dancing as a leader in a milonga. Second, they all have had the experience of a bad tanda with a leader with poor skills, they have been on the receiving end of it many times. It makes them hellbent on being a considered and comfortable leader. They also have to combat quite a few stereotypes, such as “women are terrible at navigation” or “it’s never as good as dancing with a man”. The better leaders women become, the more other women want to dance with them, which means that some followers no longer have to rely on those “half hearted consent” tandas with male leaders they are not too enthusiastic about. A lot of followers tell me that they’d much rather dance with a less experienced but careful and dedicated woman leader than with some male leaders they used to dance with before.

The only group less thrilled with this whole development are of course the male leaders who are now facing competition they didn’t see coming.

With baby leaders eager to learn, the event organisers are able to fill up more workshops during festivals. Social dancing events are now slowly opening up to possibilities of disconnecting gender from the roles, although it remains tricky, as marathons still seek gender balance for a good reason. You can specify not only your gender but whether you dance “mostly as a follower” or “mostly as a leader” or “both equally” when registering for most marathons now. And although queer tango festivals and double-role events have existed in the world for over two decades, these events are also getting an influx of fresh dancers, women (and some men) who like to dance both roles but do not necessarily identify as queer. And this is how women liberating themselves from the crushing pressure of unfair competition liberates everyone. Men are now able to dance and practice with each other if they so wish, and it clearly changes their tango experience for the better.

Lastly, all-female professional couples are getting more recognition. I know all about it because I am part of one, I work with an amazing female leader Asya Moiseeva. You can probably name one or two female leaders or duos, although globally there are still more all-male tango couples and they tend to be more famous. Despite the newly found equilibrium, tango is still very much centered on the male presence, the male skill, the male virtuosity. Although organisers are now more willing to invite all-female couples, it is often still difficult to attract male leaders to a workshop given by a female leader. On the other hand, when organisers add a female couple to their lineup, they can be sure to attract double-role dancers who will want to learn from them. This makes me hopeful for the future of all-female collaborations and for female artists to be taken more seriously. To the organisers I would like to say, no matter how much you admire your favorite male artists, you can be sure that their female partners and female professionals in general very likely had to work way harder and face more obstacles to get where they are.

A less expected outcome of women turning to leadership is that a lot of them, and especially more mature women, are discovering that they are naturally born leaders. They actually like leading way more than following. This means that many older women suddenly find an authentic voice and a place in tango where they are sought after for their skill by other women, while being overlooked by male leaders. Leading gives them a kind of a “second life” as a woman in tango. And discovering how leading naturally aligns with their personality is magical in itself. We traditionally see leading as a “masculine” role but the qualities of a good leader (being able to listen, to guide, to entertain, to engage, to protect, to take responsibility, to communicate, to connect) are actually also those of a good parent. A good mother. A lot of women are natural leaders simply because they are women. Who knew!

Does this mean that as a female follower you now absolutely have to learn how to lead? Not if you don’t feel like it. You are totally free to stick to following. The good thing about leading, it doesn’t really matter when you start, as long as you enjoy it. Your following skills will be of great help and will speed up the learning process significantly when you choose to start leading. The good news is also that as a follower, you will now see more and more good female leaders in milongas who might want to cabeceo you. Watch out for unexpected miradas. You will often not know that a woman is also an excellent leader if she dances both roles, there are not that many ways to signal to other women “I also lead”, even if you wear pants and “practice” boots. If as a woman you already lead, don’t be afraid to put yourself out there. You don’t have to be perfect. You don’t even have to be that good for you to get lots of cabeceo attempts from some of the best followers in town!

To all the people who, like the organiser of the infamous milonga in Buenos Aires, think that true tango is something that can only happen between a (heterosexual) man and a (heterosexual) woman, I feel like saying that you are allowed to feel this way about it, as long as you don’t use violence on people who have a different opinion. The beauty of tango is that it pushes you to find your own “true tango”, one that works for you, on the condition that nobody else is harmed in the process. This dance has long been defined by male bodies dancing with female bodies and we are used to it feeling this way, so two female or two male bodies dancing together are bound to feel and look different. But is different less true? Maybe for you it is. It is not for me, not with my experience. I believe that it is not our gender or sexual orientation or age or body type that make us a tango dancer, it is how we connect to our body, to the music, to the floor, to the other person. It is our ability to abandon ourselves to this dance and to make someone blissfully happy to be in our arms for just a few odd songs. That quiet, deep, transformative magic of a really good tanda. You know? I’m sure you do.

FRENCH RUSSIAN

May 12, 2026

Why tango is tough on women and what to do about it

It is often said that tango is particularly tough on women. When I say “women”, I mean female dancers who prefer the follower’s role. This article is for them and about them – us, me being one of them. This does not mean that tango is not tough on women who prefer the leader’s role or that tango is not tough on men, but these are topics for a different article. Saying that tango is tough on somebody is, of course, nonsense. Tango is no such thing, tango does not exist: it is merely a name we give to an activity shared by a great variety of people who love to dance to a particular music. But because in most tango communities women currently outnumber men, we speak of gender imbalance and this does bring with it a whole array of problems.

Women, students and friends, frequently ask me: “How  can I get more dances? How to get the dancers who ignore me? How not to spend so much time sitting and waiting?” Some say: “I can practice my technique all I want, in the end they will still choose a younger or a more attractive woman.” Followers often feel angry about the general rule of having to wait for the leader’s desire to invite them, they feel pushed back into a passive, victimizing position. Some of them, dissatisfied with it, start actively inviting leaders themselves. Sometimes this strategy works, sometimes it fails. Some women enter a tenacious downward spiral of bitterness in which each new experience seems to confirm the rule of “I am never good enough for this”.

Gender imbalance leads to a tough competition to get the available leaders and especially the better dancing ones. Here, too, exists a spiral, an upward one, one without end: the spiral of trying to be better and better at everything at once, competing with other women on all the levels, the skills, the age, the looks, the sociability, the popularity. Within an enclosed group such as a milonga, this pressure can become unbearable. Especially if you are not very self-confident, dress or look differently from everyone else, consider yourself unattractive, have an introverted temperament and so forth.

This competition among female followers is intensified by a particular phenomenon in our culture and the way our society functions in respect to female gender: women are judged by more and tougher criteria before they are considered any good. In tango this can be clearly seen in how we define who is a “good dancer”. A man will be considered a good dancer – even an excellent one – if he leads well, embraces well, knows interesting moves, interprets the music well, in short, if he is a good LEADER. We care about what a male leader DOES and much less about how he or his dance LOOKS. He may have a clumsy embrace, stooped posture, unathletic body, put his feet down carelessly, yet still be a “good dancer” in everyone’s eyes. However, we will never call a woman a “good dancer” if her posture is bad, her embrace clumsy, her feet inarticulate, her legs incapable of making beautiful lines. Where in male leaders we appreciate the leading skill, from women we demand both good following and aesthetically beautiful dancing. A woman has to DO well and LOOK well at the same time, always. This is why we have many more followers technique classes than leaders technique classes. The advantage is that we push women to become better dancers in the true sense of the word. The disadvantage is that followers need to work much harder to “get there”.

Asking how to get enough dances in a gender-imbalanced situation is, in a way, like asking “Where I live, there is not enough food. How can I still eat enough?” In this perspective we have to accept that gender imbalance can only be solved by gender balance. In many tango events the organisers impose gender balance using a strict registration policy. This helps to create optimal conditions during the event, but makes it automatically harder for unpartnered followers to get a registration for such an event. If you find yourself in a place where gender imbalance is critical, know that there are places and events where this is not the case. Ask around, find these communities, visit events that are more balanced, make friends with leaders you meet. Create yourself a group of leaders you appreciate and who appreciate you and try to meet regularly at some event where you can dance all your heart desires. What you need is simply a certain REGULARITY of good experiences. A trip somewhere once in every three months, or, if you are into tango intensely, once a month.

If you ask me “How to be well in times of shortage?”, then this question offers a different perspective. This is about not letting your psychological well-being depend on the number of leaders you dance with. This is a tough challenge in itself, but a lesson we often have to learn in life: how to make our sense of well-being independent of the things happening or not happening to us.

My advice would be to keep improving your dance skills. In the light of the above this might sound as “too bad, you are born a woman, just work harder”. Yet, to me, thinking that you can be popular and fulfilled in tango without learning the dance skill is like imagining you can be a chef just because you like to eat. Of all the advice I can give, this one is the most pertinent, the most long-term, the most effective. Tango is a dance above all else. What ultimately counts is how you dance. I am not only talking about the tango experience you can offer the other person, I am talking in the first place about what kind of tango experience you can offer YOURSELF. A blissful dance, with a deep human connection and a good dancing skill, makes all other considerations secondary. This is a very simple and profound truth. In tango the most intense happiness is that of a good dance.

“Good dance” remains, of course, a subjective and variable thing. If you manage to see growth as a way to a deeper, stronger enjoyment of the dance, you will progress steadily, your idea of “good dance” will keep changing. No matter your current skill, you can always get better, a tiny bit every time. Skill improvement is not about tedious work to get the desired dancers, it is about giving a present to yourself: the opportunity to become a better dancer for the sake of becoming a better dancer. When you are concerned with the quality, you become less anxious about the quantity.

A combination of these things (improving your skills + regularly taking yourself to a place where you get “enough” dances) – should make your tango life already quite fulfilling. But there is another level on which things can function well if you are persistent. Make sure that in everything concerning tango you navigate towards things that make you most joyful. It is important to put yourself in a good mood before you enter a milonga, for example: ready for delightful surprises, but not taking it too seriously when things do not go well. For this you need to actively look for things that bring you in this mood. Try to follow your joy in every choice, which places you go to, how you prefer to look and dress, how you wish to dance, when you would like to rest, where you like to sit and so on. When I say “joy” I do not mean pleasure, although pleasure is often part of the experience. What gives you joy is very much defined by your temperament. When people see me sitting by myself at a distance just watching the dance floor for an hour they often think I am cold, unapproachable and lonely. Yet to me these are joyful, happy, peaceful moments, because I am introverted. You might be at your most joyful surrounded by people talking and shouting and drinking. You have to know what is you and what is not you. If you keep weaving your tango experience from joyful micro-moments, you will be a happier person and a more desirable partner. It will protect you from sliding down the spiral of dissatisfaction.

In the eyes of many women tango, being a reflection of our culture, seems to favour “the young and the beautiful”. This is true for men who love dancing with beautiful young women, but this is just as true for women: we, too, love to be in the arms of young and handsome. It is important to realise, however, that in most tango communities the average age is rather high.The young crowd is often a minority. Thinking that tango is only for the young would be denying this reality. The young ones are often more passionate about becoming better dancers, but tango remains one of the very few dances in our Western culture where professionals of seventy-something still get to perform and teach at international festivals, receiving standing ovations. If you are at any age past forty and only now decided to learn tango, remember that there are many, many people out there who are exactly like you. What you need is to connect to them.

As for beauty, tango is actually a surprisingly democratic dance. This comes, again, from the simple truth that ultimately what counts is the DANCE. Beauty standards change, like fashion. When I started tango sixteen years ago my pants were long and wide and my hair short; nowadays my hair is long and my skirts are short and tight. During the “nuevo” years in Europe a lithe, flat-chested, androgynous type of female dancer was popular, nowadays it is the sexy, curvy, thin-waisted feminine type. Also, because the average age in tango is high, our subcultural beauty standards favour the adult, fully developed woman rather than a girl. No matter how you look or dress, if your priority is to love this dance, then you will always have that as your most valuable asset. Fashion, beauty images, tango itself may change, but love for the dance will not. Love and joy are always there, at the core of things, every time.

RUSSIANCHINESE

August 10, 2015

Why we are often confused about what it means to be “social”

Tango is a social dance and as such has these two components: “social” and “dance”. We all have a more or less clear idea of the “dance” component and how to get it. We all know what a skillful dancer looks like, Youtube is full of them and in a milonga we always immediately identify the “good” ones. We love watching them and want to be like them, for mastery of dance is a thing of great beauty.

But what about the “social” component? What kind of a skill is that? What does it mean to be social in tango?

On the first and most basic level, being social means respecting the common rules and practices of a particular tango context. They are sometimes very democratic and sometimes very strict, from the gender-dividing sitting arrangements in the traditional milongas of Buenos Aires to the completely free social interactions of a tango marathon. If you come to a place in which everyone respects a certain dress code (say, a Grand Saturday Ball of a big festival) and you are dressed like you just walked your dog, the message you are sending is “Carry on, I am not part of this party”. You will be probably left sitting, ignored by most people, not because they are evil, but because for them at this moment you are NOT IN THE GAME. If you do not respect the good practices of a place, you cannot complain that people do not accept you “as you are”. It does not work in tango, just as it does not work anywhere else.

On the second level, being social means respecting other dancers, both on the dancefloor and around it. A large part of it is floorcraft, the other part is the dynamic of inviting, being invited and general social interactions. Annoying, intrusive or aggressive invitations, barging in on an intimate conversation, stalking, acting insulted when rejected, forcing yourself onto a person instead of using delicate methods of approach: all of these are examples of a not very social behaviour. Respecting also means helping to keep up a friendly and relaxed atmosphere. Sour faces, loud criticism, noisy distractions, being drunk, quarrelling with your friends or loved ones in public, jealous outbursts, annoying other people with your remarks, bothering the DJ with your musical requests, complaining to the organisers while they are working: all this is a disruptive behaviour that negatively affects the atmosphere. Coming to an event in a bad mood and expecting other people to make your day is also an example of asocial behaviour, albeit a more subtle one.

The third level is of being social is respecting your dance partners, people with whom you interact the closest, or the “human factor” in the dance. It includes everything from smelling nice and being polite between the dances to creating an authentic human connection in the dance itself. It is about being responsive, sensitive to the partner’s intentions, flexible, not manipulative or otherwise physically disturbing. To me, being social in tango means these three things: respecting the context, respecting other dancers and respecting your dance partners. What you do with your time within those parameters is entirely your business, just as it is entirely your business with whom you to choose to do it.

There exists, however, a different idea of what it means to be social in tango. According to that idea the more people you dance with, the more social you are. And you are considered even more social if you dance with a lot of people you actually don’t want to dance with, but who want to dance with you or simply want to dance. The core of this idea is the belief that being social (or altruistic) is about forsaking your desires and answering to the desires of others. By this definition, a dancer who only wants a certain quality of dance experience in terms of mastery and skill, can never be truly social and is therefore an arrogant snob. In this paradigm beginners are the most social dancers of all and professionals are total assholes, unless they make a deliberate effort to dance with people they’d rather not dance with. In this case they are considered social and humble DESPITE being an amazing dancer. Being accomplished becomes the opposite of being nice. How often have you heard the remark “S/he is a great dancer, yet still such a nice and humble person”?

Where does this idea of sociability as a service come from? From the importance we attach to generosity as a social value. It comes from an often repeated statement that when you were a beginner, more advanced dancers danced with you to make you feel welcome, so, when you advance, you should do the same service to others. The common belief is that, when you become a better dancer, you have something to give to others, an important asset which is your capability to create a fulfilling dance experience, so you should generously bestow it on those who haven’t got it yet. It is true that in many cases beginners rely on the “kindness of strangers” when they come to tango, but they also dance with other beginners, as well as with people who specifically love to dance with beginners (leaders with beginner followers, mostly). Being too generous has a downside. It is often this “being just out of reach” of a certain desirable dancer that pushes us to grow.

There are situations in which you would probably be thankful to another dancer for being generous and dancing with you: when you are new to a place, when you are a total beginner, when you have been feeling alone and abandoned. If a dancer shows you this kind of generosity in a genuine way you should appreciate it, but remember that it is a choice, not an obligation. Tango is not a community service, it is a passion. People come to dance first of all to enjoy themselves, not to see whether they could be of help. Each time you find yourself resenting other dancers for not being generous enough towards you, I suggest you ask yourself a question: to whom have I been generous myself today? If you want generosity, first go and give it. The simplest way is to find a dancer you would normally reject and dance with him or her WITH A GENUINE DESIRE to be generous. Only when you regularly do something yourself can you expect the same thing from others. Expect, but not demand.

There exists a belief that this attitude of “sociability as a service to others” helps to forge stronger communities when dancers mix with each other rather than create “niches” based on affinity. There is a lot of truth to it, especially for small local scenes with little external influence that want to keep their integrity and an atmosphere free of mutual resentment. However, if a community wants to cultivate a higher level of dancing, advanced dancers should be free to dance with whomever they want to without being judged or otherwise pressured, so that they can inspire others to progress.

There is also another important component to this idea of sociability, namely the pressure to dance “with as many people as you can”. Tango, being an introverted dance, attracts many introverts into its midst. “Dancing with as many people as you can” is not a very introvert way of socializing, though. It is the extravert way of being social (leaving the skill factor aside for a moment). A typical introvert would dance two-three intense tandas with a person s/he has been hoping to dance with the whole evening and then go sit quietly in a corner, waiting for the emotions to calm. An extravert, meanwhile, might go from partner to partner with hardly a cortina in between. An introvert would have one long personal conversation with a friend, while an extrovert would collect the latest gossip, greet every person in the room, chat with several old friends and have a drink with a few new ones. We as a society have a very extraverted idea of what “social” means, for the simple reason that extraverts are a majority and real party animals. If we keep this extraverted criteria of sociability we are basically saying that introverts can never be social, but that’s absurd.

Because of this widespread idea of what it means to be social in tango we have an ongoing conflict of interests. On one hand, tango dancers are stimulated to learn and develop their dance, not only because their teachers would like that very much, but because developing your skill brings intensely pleasurable dance experience and because we want to be like the dancers we admire. On the other hand, this notion of losing one’s social credits weighs heavily on everyone wishing to become a better dancer and to connect to better partners. Dancers are made to feel guilty for not dancing with as many people as possible, for not being generous to others and sharing their “assets”. This pressure is driven by the idea that quantity matters. Instead, quantity is irrelevant altogether. What counts is the QUALITY of what you do, the kind of energy you put into it. 

Once we accept that being social means showing respect on three levels (context, dancers around you and your dance partners) and we relinquish the idea of sociability being the number of dances or the willingness to service others, but instead the QUALITY we put in all our interactions, then I believe we will have our social values in the right place. Furthermore, you can only be truly social when you are in touch with your authentic self. Because, you see, tango is both “social” and “dance”, but neither of them is tango’s real purpose. The real purpose of tango is JOY and we all have our own idea of what gives us the most profound joy. To some it means dancing a lot, to others it means dancing well with that special person. To some it means socializing with friends, to others being generous to people in need. So let’s be social, let’s be dancers, let’s all be different, but most of all let’s be joyful.

RUSSIANCHINESEGERMAN, POLISH

December 20, 2014

Why in tango we are not that social

We call tango a social dance, yet people often complain that tango is in fact not very social. It is sometimes compared to other couple dances, salsa or swing, with the conclusion that the grass is greener on the other side. Tango becomes labelled as a dance that stimulates snobbism and elitism, instead of being a welcoming environment for dancers of all kinds, ages and levels of skill. Of course, it is not all that black-and-white, or tango would not be growing as rapidly and we would not be as joyously obsessed with it. Still, there is some truth in it. So, why is tango not as social as other social dances?

Tango is there for you to have a good time. Like all things in life, it also gives you an opportunity to grow as a human being, but whether you take this opportunity or not is up to you. You can also just have a good time. What does it mean to have a good time in tango? It means to connect with people you like. All the other things, from learning the technique to buying the right shoes, are merely attributes serving the main goal: to have a fulfilling experience. What exactly is a fulfilling experience varies from person to person.

This is true for any social activity. Yet, there is one distinct difference between tango and the rest. This difference is best explained by the words “close embrace”. You see, close embrace is a tricky matter. The kind of connection we create in tango embrace is physically intimate, personal, inwardly oriented and totally encompassing. It takes time and a lot of practice to learn how to improvise together in close embrace. It is not something you just get up and do.

Tango is the most introverted of all dances, for the better the connection in the couple, the less the outer impression matters. This is also, I believe, the reason why everywhere such nice people end up creating such horrible dancefloor traffic: connecting to our partner takes up practically all of our attention. Learning to be aware of other couples is a skill that takes practice, just like ochos, but unfortunately we do not invest an equal effort in it. Tango is also a dance of profound and often serious emotion. Look at photos from any tango event and on people’s faces you will see deep inward concentration as well as a kind of inner glow. Tango connection makes us vulnerable, opens us like a book, invites us to go inside ourselves and share what we find there with another person. All of this quite discreetly. Even the erotic connection in tango, when it happens, is discreet.

To me, it comes as no surprise that we cannot (and do not want to) connect in that way with just anybody. To create this kind of connection there has to be some compatibility between people and a DESIRE on both sides. It is more surprising to me that we actually do end up connecting deeply to so many partners. To some we prefer not to, and this often causes suffering and becomes a highly debated issue. In tango rejection and avoidance seem to directly impact our intrinsic value as a human being, rejection hurts, a little or a lot, depending on how much importance we attach to it. Knowing how rejection affects ourselves, we also find it tricky to reject others. We are empathic beings, despite the cruelties we are capable of. We normally prefer not to cause other people harm we ourselves would rather avoid.

Tango is a quickly growing subculture, but it consists mainly of small local scenes. The smaller the community, the stronger the social ties and therefore the more profound the consequences of a rejection. In bigger cities the communities tend to form subgroups, because as humans we are only capable of comfortably socializing with a limited number of people. The moment we find ourselves in too large a crowd, it is similar to finding ourselves in a desert: we cannot connect to all those people around us meaningfully and therefore only care about those inside our circle of friends. This explains why in a small scene a stranger feels welcome, but in a big city the same person feels lost and ignored. This does not mean people in small scenes are warm-hearted and those in big cities are arrogant assholes. This view is a bit too simplistic.

To deal with the not-so-social side of tango you can start by accepting your basic right to a preference. Our life is also a “social dance” and in life we say “yes” to some experiences and “no” to others all the time. It does not matter what your reason is for wanting to dance with a particular person, but if you feel a DESIRE then your reason is valid. It may be considered wrong by others, it may even be considered wrong by yourself. It does not matter. What matters is the desire. The same is true for NOT wanting to dance with someone: the reason “why” does not matter. Often we cannot even explain why we want or don’t want a certain experience. Desire works in mysterious ways.

Next, accept that other people, too, have a right to a preference. Other people are just like you. They feel a desire or they don’t. All reasons to dance or not to dance with you are valid, even if you consider them wrong or hurtful. The desire can also come during the dance, like appetite. The desires might not match, but that is usually not a problem. Someone might want to dance with you because you are young and beautiful, whereas you want to dance with that person because s/he is an experienced dancer. As long as you are both desiring that dance, it works. The mutual desire gives a chance to forge that initial connection from which a fulfilling dance can be created. A chance, not a guarantee. What about “transactional” dances, the practice of taxi dancers? Believe or not, there is desire on both sides in that kind of tango, too: the desire to have a partner to dance with on one hand and the desire to make money on the other. You might think this kind of a desire is morally wrong, but it is simply different from yours.

We often think of desire as willingness to take, but when you invite somebody to dance or accept an invitation, you should also be willing to give. If you accept to dance without desire and then just wait for the tanda to end, you are not giving anything. Accepting to dance and merely showing how much you dislike it is disrespectful to your partner. If you are not willing to make the effort to enjoy the dance, to adapt to it in a positive way, learn to say “no”. If you are inviting, ask yourself: what do I want from this dancer and what am I able and willing to give in return? People always feel sharply when you only wish to take. They become much less willing to give it to you. I am not talking necessarily about the level of skill, it is not even necessarily about tangible things. If you have a giving attitude, your chances of success are simply much higher.

When inviting (as a man or a woman), do not put people in situations in which it becomes difficult for them to refuse your invitation. You will never get a fulfilling dance with someone who is not willing to connect, the experience will be mediocre at most. Remember, saying “no” is just as difficult as being rejected, you can’t help feeling bad afterwards. Use mirada and cabeceo to avoid the awkwardness of a verbal refusal and to give the other person a discreet way out. By accepting each person’s right to a desire, you can also accept the rejection without feeling that it has an impact on your value. The reason for not desiring to dance with you sometimes has nothing to do with you and sometimes it has everything to do with you. Accept that you will never know. Unless you ask that person “why”, all your thoughts and opinions are just that: your own thoughts and opinions. Accept the rejections gracefully. Relieve it of all importance and forget about it. Do not make that person into your personal enemy. Do not demand explanations, unless you choose the right moment and are prepared to hear the answer. Do not beg. Do not make the person feel more uncomfortable than s/he is already feeling. Do not act entitled or insulted. Do not post messages about why some people are wrong not to dance with you. Do not call people snobs. Do not discuss their outrageous reasons not to dance with you, you have probably invented those reasons yourself. All the above actions will only have one result: you will feel worse.

“This is all very nice”, you might say, “but I live in a community in which there is a very limited choice of partners. If I allow myself the luxury to only choose people I truly desire to dance with, I will probably not dance at all. Either because I desire people who ignore me or there are no people around I truly desire.” These situations are indeed not easy. Yet, you cannot simply discard or force the desire. Putting pressure on men to dance with more women because of a gender imbalance will not solve the gender imbalance, only getting more men into tango will solve it. Making people feel guilty and hoping they will want to dance with you will not be productive either, desire does not work this way. If you are short of dancers you like, look for them elsewhere, start to travel, there are plenty of partners out there. If you find yourself short of partners who like you, find ways of becoming a desirable dancer or look for those who might like you now. All solutions can pay off in delightful ways. Tango is there for you to have a good time, but if you use it to grow as a human being, your journey will be so much more surprising.

RUSSIAN, ITALIAN, CHINESE#1, CHINESE#2, ROMANIANPOLISH

June 3, 2014

Why we fight when practicing, especially with people we love

To improve in tango you need to practice, but practicing on your own will only improve your own movement, not your leading or following skills. To practice tango you need another person. Why do we practice? To feel better when we dance. What do we want out of practicing? Results. We want our practice to be efficient and effective. But you see, things and processes can be efficient and effective, but humans usually are not. Humans are human. They have feelings. And this is when the trouble starts.

Practicing is about development and work. Each of us has his or her own working style, influenced by what we are and what we do. We each have a particular emotional and mental state that we consider productive or creative. Some need a certain degree of frenzy to feel productive, others, on the contrary, want total calm and an undisturbed focus. Some are like fireworks, their productivity comes in bright explosions. Others are like gletchers, moving slowly but surely in a given direction. Our productive state depends not only on our temperament, activities and character, but also on what has brought us good results before. If your background is in competitive sports you will probably need some adrenaline and pressure, you will want to push yourself beyond your limits. If your background is in creative work, you will probably thrive when allowed to clear a calm space for yourself and let your mind wonder. A productive state is a state of NON-RESISTANCE. It is a state in which your “point of awareness” is allowed to flow freely, unrestricted by rigid expectations or opinions.

When two people work together in the same field, their productive states often resemble each other. In tango, scientists practice with designers, architects with doctors, public officers with beauticians, software engineers with ballerinas. In tango your productive states might not be compatible at all. Practicing together is about collaboration, and the bad news is that collaborating is a skill that does not come naturally. The good news is that this skill can be learned. Even if your working styles are different, you can still establish a process that brings satisfactory results, but it will require some work.

How can you know when you are in a productive state? It feels like things start to work out on their own, ideas come easily and have value and originality. You feel enthusiasm, excitement, challenge, joy. When you are nowhere near the productive state you feel tense, uneasy, unhappy, stressed, tired, frustrated. How to recognise if your partner is in a productive state? By looking for the indications of the same feelings. Often this is not easy. We are all different in how we express our inner life. Someone may look thoughtful and aloof, while feeling great excitement and inspiration inside. Another might be all over the place with excitement, but in reality only desperately trying to mask his or her feelings of inadequacy. You will have to know your partner a bit to know when s/he is in a productive state. And you will have to know yourself, too.

Why is practicing together in tango sometimes so difficult? First of all, working together very closely with just one person IS quite difficult. Whether it is a business you two are running together, a book you are co-writing or a house you are designing, a close collaboration always provides challenges. Tango adds an important difficulty on top of this. And no, it is not love. You can be in love, run a business together and tear each other to pieces at every business meeting, too. The additional difficulty of tango is that it is a dance. When you are writing a book or building a house you can still take a step back, look at the result and discuss its qualities independent of you as people. In dance the result is your movement and therefore your body. There is nothing more YOU in this life than your body, and so every appraisal or critique of your dance is automatically an appraisal or a critique of YOU.

There is a second by-coming difficulty. The higher the follower’s skill, the greater the leader will feel in the dance. The higher the leader’s skill, the greater the follower will feel. The quality of the dance depends on you both equally, on your technique but also on your willingness to dance together, your improvisational skills, energy and dedication. Tango, being a dance of improvisation, is highly dependent on how both partners FEEL at that moment. You have probably noticed that your dance skill seems to improve when you feel great and it tends to (sometimes dramatically) decline if you feel like crap. Why you feel great or like crap, is a different story and can have many reasons. The fact remains that the way you feel IN THAT MOMENT will greatly influence your dance.

What happens in tango practicing, especially if two people are in love, is that the slightest critique is taken very personally and is therefore extremely hurtful. Unconsciously you always want to be the best for your partner in everything, including tango. Learning that your ochos are not very good is a hard truth when coming from a teacher, but it is even harder to cope with when coming from your partner. With a teacher we accept their authority over us, but with our partner we want to be equal (unless our partner is our teacher).

Critique, no matter how carefully stated, feels like aggression, even if the person is well-trained in receiving critique. This is an inbuilt mechanism that allows us to recognise potentially threatening situations and therefore trigger our “fight or flight” reflex. A partner criticising your ochos, in this sense, is no different from a tiger looming ahead of you. The perceived threat might not have the same intensity, but the reaction in your brain and body is similar. When you are tense, your movements are somewhat constricted and your balance more difficult to keep, but when you feel calm and positive your movements flow easier. There is one simple explanation for this. When the “fight or flight” reflex is triggered, your brain wants you to quickly focus on one of those two behaviors and forget all the rest – forget it LITERALLY. When there is a tiger, the last thing your brain wants you to do is beautiful ochos. This is why critique, felt as aggression, will lead to defensiveness or a counter-attack, and not immediately to improved results.  

Then how, you might ask, are we supposed to practice at all, if we cannot criticise what the other person is doing or, for that matter, what we ourselves are doing? How are we supposed to work on solutions if we are not allowed to mention the problem?

There is one simple method. It is not easy to implement, but this is the case with all really simple things in life. The way you can constructively discuss a problem and find satisfying solutions together is to make it not about you or your partner, but about THIS. This thing you are creating together. This dance. This connection. This move. This ocho. This step. This particular point of balance. You have to dis-identify who you are from what you are doing.

To achieve this, always define the problem in neutral yet very precise terms. Instead of saying “You always lose your balance, push the floor!” you should say “I think here I need you to be stronger on your standing leg so that I can finish this move in such and such way”. Make it about THIS and also, in solution terms, about US and our NEEDS. When your partner does not feel criticised or aggressed, s/he will be more than happy to oblige. People are usually quite willing to give something when you ask nicely. Often it is difficult to understand which one of you contributes more to the problem. In this case the best formula is “I don’t know if it’s me or you, but I feel that here we are losing balance. Let me try something. What do you feel now?” In any given area you will progress faster if you keep focusing on the solution instead of the problem. Ideas will come quicker and your body will find the right moves faster if you don’t identify with the problem. And you will have to be PATIENT, too. With yourself and your partner. Patient, forgiving and simply nice.

Most importantly, stop terrorizing yourself and stop terrorizing your partner. If you want results, your most important assets are a happy, collaborative self and a happy, collaborative partner. To have this, you will need to stop doing all the things that make yourself and your partner unhappy. It is that simple. Remember, the quality of your dance together depends on how you both feel. If you take the position “I need you to be perfect before I can fully express myself” then guess what: you can wait forever. Never skip an opportunity to improve yourself, even if your partner is far from being what you would like him or her to be. Praise your partner for everything you like about his or her dancing. Take the “like” button with you everywhere you go. Praise genuinely, with real feeling. The more you praise the good things, the happier your partner will be, the easier the results will come. Mutual admiration and mutual respect are keys to effective collaboration: once they are gone, it is very difficult to bring them back. This also applies to yourself. Praise yourself for everything you already like about your dance. It does not matter that your vision is still far from where you are. You are getting there, step by step. Acknowledge the steps.

Make sure every time you practice, you bring yourself in your productive state first. Do whatever it requires. Watch your favorite tango videos or your favorite cat videos, it really does not matter. Check if your partner is also in his or her productive state and then make your priority not the final result but the joy of getting there. Believe me, not only will you get there, but you will both be happier in the process.

RUSSIAN, HUNGARIANROMANIAN

November 29, 2013

Why you should get out of the sandbox and start asking yourself questions

During my years in tango I have encountered, and still encounter frequently, a certain attitude in dancers (both men and women, but more often in women), which can be summarized as follows: “people with whom I would like to dance don’t dance with me. They are not being social. They should be more open, get out of their little world, try a new dancer (me), accept me the way I am and enjoy what I have to offer.” The usual consequences of this attitude is that the person gets frustrated. Slowly – or quickly – the frustration overshadows other aspects of tango experience, the person feels rejected and a vicious circle establishes itself: the dancer feels others don’t want him/her, gets into a bad mood, and gets even less dances as a result.

You can agree or disagree with this attitude. I personally disagree, but the reason I am writing this is not because I want to judge it, but because, first, I want to understand it, and second, because I want to help change this attitude into something more productive. 

If you have never suffered from this frustration, you can now stop reading. If you, however, find yourself entertaining thoughts such as “why, why doesn’t he invite me/doesn’t she look at me” or “all these snobby little groups only dancing among themselves, I so wish for once they would poke their nose out there in the real world and see everybody else” – then what I am writing here might help you leave this frustration behind and find more joy in tango. 

When we start an activity, such as tennis or photography or painting, we somehow from the beginning do not expect our tennis coach to want to play with us for his own fun. We do not expect photography magazines to publish our first pictures or art galleries to come rushing to get our first paintings. It still might happen, but we all understand that this is an exception. In no other domain of life do we expect others to value and appreciate and desire us without some prior personal investment in our SKILL. However, as soon as a person enters the tango world, sometimes it looks like s/he forgets this simple rule of life, the rule of personal investment and of reciprocal interest.  

How come that intelligent, educated and otherwise experienced people come to entertain such an unrealistic expectation? The confusion lies partially in the misinterpretation of the word “social”. “Social” in tango means that you dance with another person in a couple and with other couples around you on the dancefloor. And that between tandas there can be “socialising” to help you do your “tango networking”. “Social” does not mean that other people will accept you exactly the way you are and dance with you only because you want to dance. “Social” does not mean that other people owe you something or are obliged to give you a good time. You don’t have this obligation, either. But they CAN give you a good time, and so CAN you. 

Where else in life are we accepted and welcomed exactly the way we are, without first having to invest in some SKILL, integrate in the environment, have something to offer first? Right: when we are little children with our parents and with other children in the sandbox. Our parents will accept and love us exactly the way we are, and it is in the sandbox that other children will play with us, unless we behave really unfriendly. But tango is not a sandbox, other dancers are not your parents nor are they other children.  

If you would like another dancer to dance with you, you have to ask yourself two questions. 

First, why do you like him/her? And second, what kind of dancer/person would you have to be to be liked in return?  

The answer to the first question is very often “because I really like how s/he dances”. Which usually means that you understood what tango is about, and your priorities are in the right place. It is possible that this person does not think the same of you. There is no objective “good dancer” and “bad dancer”, there is just a great variety of preferences. Don’t ask yourself the question “WHY doesn’t s/he like me”, it is not the right question to ask and you will never find the right answer because you cannot know that. Ask yourself instead: “what does this person seem to enjoy in people with whom s/he does dance?” Observe, notice, be aware. 

The answer to the next question (“what kind of dancer would I have to be to be liked”) can vary from “I have to be one of the top five dancers in this milonga” to “I have to be young, blond and wear a mini-skirt”. Remember, that every answer in this range is a VALID REASON TO DANCE WITH SOMEBODY. That a person likes to dance only with accomplished dancers does not make this person a snob, because if this person is a snob, so are you. YOU too want to dance with accomplished dancers. If the answer to this question is “blond and mini-skirt” than this person has other priorities and has a perfect right to. It may very well be that your priorities don’t match. If becoming blond and wearing a mini-skirt is against your principles, switch your interest to another dancer – or change your principles. If you understand that you have to become a more accomplished dancer, then find a teacher you like and start improving your dance. If you feel it is your social skill, or the way you dress, or the way you present yourself – then try to understand what other people do, people who in your eyes are more “successful”. Do not condemn them for being different from you, for they can help you. 

If you are a man and a woman says no to you, do not act insulted. Remember, you are not in the sandbox anymore. Be a man. Be worthy of the woman you want. Do not tell your male friends “this one only dances with the teachers” because when she will say yes to your friend, YOU will feel like an idiot. If you are a woman, do not judge other dancers for their preferences. Remember, you want this man to invite you because there is something of value in him, because there is something about him that you LIKE. Be ready to give, not only to take. Cultivate your skill, develop yourself, improve. Be generous, but do not dance with people you don’t want to dance with. If you dance with “whomever” just because you feel you have to dance, don’t be surprised that “whoever” keeps inviting you. 

It does not really matter WHY you desire someone in tango, but understand that the desire is an essential element and that is has to be mutual. If the other person does not desire you, you can either find something that will make you desirable, or find another object of attention. Ultimately, true tango is not primarily a meeting of two skills. It is a meeting of two desires. And from there on the rest is up to you.

RUSSIAN, BULGARIANROMANIANPOLISH

October 20, 2013